PikalyLoading artwork…

Generative art vs AI art

They get lumped together, but they’re opposites in the way that matters most. The short version: one makes the machine that makes the art; the other uses a machine — trained on everyone else’s art — to make the art. Pikaly is firmly the first kind.

The core difference

It comes down to where the art actually comes from:

Trained on nothing

This is the part that decides whether a piece is really “yours.” A Pikaly generator contains all of its own information — the rules are the artwork. Nothing here is trained on other artists’ images, and nothing is scraped. As the generative artist Tyler Hobbs says of his own work, it has “neither input nor training — all information exists in the code itself.”

A tradition, not a trend

Generative art predates AI image models by sixty years. Vera Molnár was composing with algorithms by hand in 1959; Sol LeWitt sold wall drawings as written instructions in the 1960s (“the idea becomes a machine that makes the art”); the Bauhaus and Josef Albers built entire bodies of work from systematic rules. Pikaly’s generators are homages in exactly that lineage — Bauhaus geometry, LeWitt’s line systems, Albers’ color, Bridget Riley’s op-art, Jean Arp’s laws of chance.

Why it matters for you